SEO is a dying language. Google Zero is upon us. Media businesses are already seeing the impact of the zero clickthrough economy, where the search and ads business provides information right on the search engine results page (SERP) rather than directing users through to other sites.
Recent research has demonstrated the extent to which Google Zero is impacting traffic to publishers’ websites. Pew Research Center found that “users who encountered an AI summary clicked on a traditional search result link in 8% of all visits. Those who did not encounter an AI summary clicked on a search result nearly twice as often (15% of visits)”.
Worse still, those users are “more likely to end their browsing session entirely after visiting a search page with an AI summary than on pages without a summary”. It is an end to curiosity. And, crucially for news publishers, it is curtailing discovery. That is especially difficult for commodity news sites, which have made advertising served to unknown audiences their priority. Those logged-out users have little incentive to click through to receive exactly the same information, but with more ads served up to them.
It is already hitting home: over 60% of Gen Z and 50% of millennials are already choosing to use AI – on platforms like ChatGPT – instead of conventional search.
Logging in
It is, at least, validation for the news and information businesses that have prioritized creating a logged-in ecosystem.
Just as Google is driving the open web with its zero clickthrough approach, the name of the game for those businesses is keeping users within their own ecosystem. External links, attrition of interest, or even just the allure of new types of content elsewhere… these all run the risk of loosening the net and having users slip out.
But those businesses are in the minority. For example, 78% of digital revenue across DCN’s members still comes from advertising. But that revenue is now under threat, as advertisers seek to shift spend to AI-powered search results.
So, media businesses are both grappling with Google Zero and seeking to retain audiences at all times. Are there any silver bullets?
Unusually for this industry, the answer this time might just be ‘yes’. To a point, at least.
The app, a regular fixture within a media business’ arsenal, might provide the solution to those issues – as long as publishers recognize how audiences use them in 2025.
Multimedia apps
As parts of the industry seek to make the logged-in economy the standard, how far along the path to primacy are news apps?
On the face of it, the initial stats look bleak. Per the 2025 Reuters Institute Digital News Report, younger audiences are increasingly unlikely to visit news sites or apps.
These findings build upon research from the previous year’s report, which found that only 22% of news consumers in general identify news websites or apps as their main source of online news. That was down a full 10 percentage points when compared to respondents in 2018.
However, publishers have not been ignorant of that fact. Many have done their best to ameliorate that issue. They have taken note of the fact that audiences are choosing to receive news content in the form of digital video. In order to cater to that – as well as the trend towards vertical video on mobile devices – media companies, including the BBC, have chosen to include vertical video within their apps.
It is part of a wider trend towards making news apps more multimedia-oriented. The thought process is: if AI is making it harder to bring news consumers into the ecosystem, we need to cater to a wider variety of their wants once they are within. That should – in theory – prevent them from leaving.
Sarah Hartman, VP of product at The New York Times, says her team is investing in that multimedia approach: “The app also offers an optimal experience of our audio journalism. We’re increasingly leaning into multimodal UX to give our users more flexibility and control, while always meeting our high standards of craft.”
In the UK, the Observer (formerly Tortoise Media) is making a concerted effort to keep listeners to its in-app audio around once they have finished a podcast episode. Its audience growth editor for podcasts Aleena Augustine explained at the Publisher App Summit 2025 that the app has a dedicated curation team, who manually create a recommendation feed per podcast designed to lead listeners onto another piece of content, whether audio or text.
Speaking at the same event Muj Ali, group product manager of acquisition, retention and apps for the Financial Times, noted that 70% of its subscriber traffic now comes via its app.
He also stated that there is plenty of headroom to expand its content and audience strategies: “It’s the most engaged channel that we have, but also the most underutilized… but in general, it’s a place that we want to continue to grow.”
Games and growth
While news and information is the bread and butter of a media business’s activity, the need to keep audiences within the app is forcing many to branch out into other areas. Famously, the New York Times has increasingly invested in games precisely because of how “sticky” they make its app. Other titles, including the Telegraph and Guardian in the UK, have emulated that approach as well.
This shift is backed up by research from Pugpig: apps with games and multimedia more generally have a significantly higher engagement rate than those with news content alone.
That has also been demonstrated outside of the hard news environment. In the UK, Stylist found that audience members who engaged with its puzzles were 68% more likely to read an article that same week.
Additionally, publishers are trying to make the content within their apps more habit-based than incidental: according to the same 2025 Pugpig Media App Report, edition-based news apps outperform their timeline-based equivalents with regards to engagement. It speaks to an opportunity app-based publishers have to zig where the always-available AI search entities zag.
Appointment-based publishing, audio and video, and games are likely to get people to stick around once they are within the app. With AI-powered search, however, the task of getting audiences into a news publishers’ ecosystem remains a difficult one.
Hartman states that, as with all of the NYT’s products, the best use of its app is to highlight the strong journalistic work its team produces: “We’ll likely need to evolve our interfaces to meet changing user expectations around personalization, adaptability, and brevity. But we also believe that the fundamental purpose of our app, providing a direct connection to our journalism served in the best possible way, will continue to be a valuable proposition.”
For news publishers with strong brands and reputations, it might well be possible to stem the tide of Google Zero.
Audiences are becoming more aware of AI-search’s limitations, and publishers can provide context beyond a SERP snippet. Provided those media businesses have invested in making their apps sticky. For, once audiences have landed, the humble app may indeed be a solution to this new problem.













Facebook and Google are a strong hold in the app marketplace; 7 of the Top 25 apps, based on unique visitors, are owned by these two companies. Of the Top 25 apps, the three leading categories, based on unique visitors, are Utilities (9), Social (6) and Entertainment (6 – tied). Facebook, the largest social platform accounts for 76% of all time spent on social apps. App position on smartphone correlates to usage. Not surprisingly, apps with easy access on the home screen showed strong audience reach. Smartphone users spend approximately 45% of their app time on their #1 most used app, and about 73% on of that time of their Top 3 apps.


