- Digiday | Upping dispute over political ads rules, The Financial Times pulls Facebook ads from the UK (3 min read)
- The Washington Post | Apple’s Tim Cook blasts Silicon Valley over privacy issues (4 min read)
-
Adweek | What a Decentralized Web Means for Digital Advertising (4 min read)
-
The Financial Times | How smartphone apps track users and share data (8 min read)
-
The Atlantic | How Facebook’s Chaotic Push Into Video Cost Hundreds of Journalists Their Jobs (9 min read)
-
The Guardian | ‘He’s my guy’: Donald Trump praises Gianforte for assault on Guardian reporter (4 min read)
-
The Hollywood Reporter | Apple CEO Tim Cook to Back Strong Privacy Laws in EU, U.S. (2 min read)
-
Axios | Digital transition triggers ad industry trust crisis (3 min read)
-
The Drum | Siri: What will advertising on voice look/sound like? (5 min read)
-
The Guardian | Facebook and Google are run by today’s robber barons. Break them up (5 min read)
Articles by: "Michelle Manafy, Editorial Director – DCN"
DCN’s must reads: week of October 25, 2018
DCN’s recommended reading: week of October 18, 2018
Our picks of the must-read stories from around the web:
- The Wall Street Journal | Advertisers Allege Facebook Failed to Disclose Key Metric Error for More Than a Year (4 min read)
- CBS News | “Far from an honest mistake”: Facebook accused of inflating ad data (4 min read)
- NiemanLab | Did Facebook’s faulty data push news publishers to make terrible decisions on video? (11 min read)
- The New York Times | New York Attorney General Expands Inquiry Into Net Neutrality Comments (5 min read)
- Axios | The next big wave of publisher traffic (2 min read)
- Digiday | Why the FBI is investigating media buying practices (4 min read)
- The New York Times | In Virginia House Race, Anonymous Attack Ads Pop Up on Facebook (4 min read)
- The Drum | Neuroscience and ‘baked in’ brand safety: how BBC Global News pitches its content arm (4 min read)
- The Financial Times | Tame tech and drive innovation towards a fair inclusive society (3 min read)
- The Hollywood Reporter | “There’s a Shakeout Coming”: Streaming TV’s Arms Race May Make Cable Look Like a Deal (5 min read)
- AdExchanger | Bloomberg’s Bullish Plan To Make Digital Media Work (5 min read)
DCN’s must reads: week of October 11, 2018
Here are some of the best media stories our team has read so far this week:
- The New York Times | Soldiers in Facebook’s War on Fake News Are Feeling Overrun (7 min read)
- Reuters | EU privacy chief expects first round of fines under new law by year-end (4 min read)
- Wired | Google’s Privacy Whiplash Shows Big Tech’s Inherent Contradictions (5 min read)
- Digiday | Conde Nast International’s Wolfgang Blau: ‘Europe seems to play defense’ (4 min read)
- AdAge | What Google’s data snafu means for the for $88B digital ad industry (3 min read)
- CNBC | Expect continued media consolidation, because scale matters, 21st Century Fox vice chair says (3 min read)
- Forbes | The Wall Street Journal Tops A New Index Of Most Trustworthy Media Brands (3 min read)
- Recode | A few words about Cindy Lobel (4 min read)
- AdExchanger | Fraudsters Are Masquerading As Real DSPs (5 min read)
- Variety | Listen: Turner’s Jesse Redniss on How AT&T Changes the Data Game (30 min listen)
DCN’s must reads: week of October 4, 2018
Here are some of the best media stories our team has read so far this week:
- The Washington Post | Mainstream advertising is still showing up on polarizing and misleading sites — despite efforts to stop it (11 min read)
- The Wall Street Journal | Federal Prosecutors Probe Ad Industry’s Media-Buying Practices (3 min read)
- Techcrunch | Europe is drawing fresh battle lines around the ethics of big data (16 min read)
- The New York Times | Russian Meddling Is a Symptom, Not the Disease (5 min read)
- Bloomberg | Trump Administration Sues California Over Net Neutrality Law (2 min read)
- Digiday | ‘We’re giving them a harder time’: Axel Springer tries to turn up heat on Facebook (4 min read)
- CNBC | Apple’s Tim Cook: ‘Don’t believe’ tech companies that say they need your data (3 min read)
- Medium | The Rumors of Podcasting’s Death Have Been Greatly Exaggerated (11 min read)
- The Washington Post | Big tech is still violating your privacy (5 min read)
Understanding the impact, and objectives, of Google’s news patronage
Media companies have a well-documented love/hate relationship with Google. Though search engines undoubtedly make content discoverable to vast audiences, the disintermediation of sources has devalued the brands that invest significant resources in creating credible information. Google also dominates digital video (YouTube) and is a major force in mobile (Android), giving it even more power over content distribution, consumption, and monetization. So, publishers are rightfully wary when Google offers to support journalistic endeavors.
New research from The European Journalism Observatory examines the impact of the Google News Initiative has had journalism. This 150-million-euro program was launched in 2015 “to promote innovation in journalism.” Over the past three years, the program has invested 115 million euro in journalism-related projects. (Google, meanwhile, has pledged $300 million over three years to support journalism initiatives. While this is a not-insignificant sum, it is important to note that the bulk of Google’s $110 billion 2017 earnings came from digital ad revenue and that parent company Alphabet is valued at $800 billion.)
The EJO’s data, which is based on a project registry that they scraped from the Digital News Initiative (DNI) website and then coupled with additional reporting, sheds light on who Google gives money to and what kind of projects are funded by the Internet giant. They found that the typical recipient of Google funding is a commercial legacy institution in Western Europe. Meanwhile, non-profit news organizations and public-service media rarely receive funding.
A large part of Google’s money goes to “the media establishment,” with more than half of the European funding allocated to long-standing commercial publishing houses, including projects at Trinity Mirror, the Telegraph Media Group, and Thomson Reuters in the UK.
Other findings include:
- More than half of recipient organizations were founded in or before 1997.
- Most (83%) are based in Western Europe.
- The typical recipient of Google funding is for-profit, with only 10% of funding found to be for non-profit or public-service media.
- A quarter of the funding is handed to non-publishing organizations, including start-ups that develop services for the industry.
It is significant to note that Google funding comes with one major condition: It does not fund content per se, but rather projects that “show innovation.”
The data offers some insight into what innovation means from Google’s perspective:
- 20% of the DNI projects in the survey are aimed at new forms of presentation of content (such as virtual reality)
- 8% of the projects are dedicated to fact-checking and credibility
- 12% are geared towards community building and crowdsourcing
The big question, of course, is what Google is trying to achieve with its sponsorship. Significantly, the research points out that while projects may appear to compete with Google products, they mostly complement Google’s existing online ecosystem. In fact, the research revealed that several of the projects are based on Google services, which provides an additional benefit to Google in exchange for its support.
Ultimately, it is impossible to view Google’s investment in news (or academic research) as altruistic. As the EJO’s research states, the funding it gives to media institutions actually helps Google safeguard its long-term interests. Citing the company’s evolution from search engine to central node for the production and distribution of news, they find that, “Google has built an ecosystem that no publisher can ignore.” Neither can publishers ignore the implications and motivations of Google’s patronage.
DCN’s must reads: week of September 27, 2018
Our picks of the must-read stories from around the web:
- Salon | Tech billionaires keep buying publications. Here’s what that means for the future of journalism (5 min read)
- The Wall Street Journal | Big Tech’s Business Model Is Broken, Report Says (3 min read)
- European Journalism Observatory | The Publisher’s Patron: How Google’s News Initiative Is Re-Defining Journalism (14 min read)
- Bloomberg | EU Eyes Facebook Privacy Practices, Are Other Social Media Next? (4 min read)
- The Washington Post | Instagram has a drug problem. Its algorithms make it worse. (9 min rad)
- Slate | The Temptation of Apple News (14 min read)
- Axios | Apple to tell Senate it backs “comprehensive” privacy rules (1 min read)
- Politico | The next antitrust standoff — Big Tech’s use of data (6 min read)
- Digiday | ‘Facebook doesn’t operate with real-world metrics’: GroupM talks tough on Facebook (5 min read)
DCN’s must reads: week of September 20, 2018
Our picks of the must-read stories from around the web:
- Adweek | With Less Data-Driven Baggage, Can Apple Help Lead the Way on Advertising Privacy? (4 min read)
- The Verge | Google is giving up some control of the AMP format (4 min read)
- TechCrunch | Old media giants turn to VC for their next act (8 min read)
- Medium | Media Manipulation, Strategic Amplification, and Responsible Journalism (35 min read)
- Crownpeak | The GDPR’s Regulatory Bears Are Stirring – And They’re Not Happy About Your Half-Assed Compliance Efforts (5 min read)
- https://www.crownpeak.com/blog/general-data-protection-regulation/gdpr-regulatory-bears-are-stirring
- Digiday | Project Feels: How USA Today, ESPN and The New York Times are targeting ads to mood (4 min read)
- NPR | Does Facebook Really Work? People Question Effectiveness Of Ads (3 min read)
- NiemanLab | Fighting back against fake news: A new UN handbook aims to explain (and resist) our current information disorder (11 min read)
- The Wall Street Journal | Amazon Forecast to Be No. 3 Digital Advertising Player in 2018 (2 min read)
- The Guardian | Ofcom to push for regulation of social networks (3 min read)
- Vulture | Bob Greenblatt Saved NBC. Now What? The TV exec opens up about the Peacock’s dark days, what else he’d love to reboot, and the streaming future. (5 min read)
Research shows that American voters support press freedom but miss signs it’s under threat
One of the fundamental tenants of the United States of America is that a robust free press is vital to an informed public. The good news is that an unequivocal majority of registered voters believe in the importance of a free press. However, many do not perceive that this crucial freedom is at risk. A new report, Press Freedom For the People, by the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press set out to understand the public’s perceptions of press freedom at a moment in time when trust in the press remains low, and when the president of the United States regularly deems members of the press “enemy of the people” and refers to entire news organizations as “fake news.”
Through a series of focus groups and a 2,000-voter survey, the research found that there is a lack of urgency around the idea that press freedom is at risk here in the U.S. According to the report, 52% of voters do not see press freedom as under threat. The lack of perceived risk that was even higher when viewed through a partisan lens: 66% of Republicans and 56 %of Independents said they perceived little or no threat to the press, while just 38% of Democrats gave the same response.
As other studies have shown, trust in the national news media is low. Only 28% of registered voters report to have a great deal of trust in national broadcast news and only 23% say they have a great deal of trust in national newspapers.
Despite this lack of trust, nearly all voters (95%) agree on the importance of having a free press. Across party affiliation, the research found that an overwhelming majority believe it is important that the press be free in the United States, and most voters (76%) know that freedom of the press is a First Amendment right.
The research makes 6 suggestions that will help regain American’s trust:
1. Embrace the press’s role to inform.
Voters want a news media that informs them of the facts. They see this as the press’s highest value and a reason to defend the press. Underscoring the news media’s responsibility to inform the public is a far more convincing reason to defend press freedom than other frames, such as highlighting the role of the press in a democracy or even making comparisons to press treatment in other countries.
2. Address the perception of bias.
Voters want to hear the news that presents the full story from all sides. Bias is one of people’s top doubts about the news media. They also do not want a news outlet that just gives them news that reflects their own point of view. Significantly, some respondents expressed concern that the need to profit from the news could cause biases while others worry that powerful owners and sponsors may affect the news.
3. Keep President Trump out of the press freedom conversation.
To effectively advocate across the political spectrum for protection of a free press, President Trump must be left out of the discussion. His mention polarizes focus groups participants immediately; both sides see him very differently. For right-leaning participants, he is holding the media to task and they are being unfair.
4. Build connections with conservative audiences.
While an overall plurality of voters believes calling for boos and other actions against journalists is never justified, 52% believe that politicians engaging in this behavior are just reflecting public frustrations. To reach voters who have lost trust, it is important to show that treatment of the press isn’t a Trump issue, but rather a serious deterioration of the ability of the press to inform. The survey data points to three key target Republican groups that may be most fertile to this message and suggests that influencing this segment can shift overall public perception.
5. Use the facts.
The lack of urgency around the threat against the press is a major finding from the research — and indicates an uphill battle in terms of mobilizing the public to support the media. However, there is some hope. Researchers found that introducing facts about the threat journalists currently face shifts voters’ view and impacts the urgency with which voters see the situation.
6. Promote accountability.
The resource found that most important thing the media can do to show they are a credible source is to acknowledge when they make mistakes and issue corrections. There is a sense that people are looking for real humility from the press, both in terms of how they deliver the news and inform, and in how they acknowledge any shortcomings or mistakes.
As Jenn Topper, Communications Director, Reporters Committee For Freedom Of The Press wrote in the report, the larger concern is that a combination of current factors will be chips at the First Amendment and its protections for a free and independent press. If the public is conditioned to accept these gradual limitations on press freedom as normal — and in some cases even echo the attacks themselves, rather than vigorously defend against them — we are in a precarious position. Media organizations need to proactively address issues of trusts and focus on their role to inform the public – including informing them about threats to freedom of the press.
DCN’s must reads: week of September 13, 2018
Here are some of the best media stories our team has read so far this week:
- The New York Times | For Big Tech, a Comeuppance We’ve Seen Before: On Wall St. (6 min read)
- Yale Insights | Can Trusted Brands Beat ‘Fake News’? (12 min read)
- Business Insider | One viral thread shows how quickly YouTube steers people to wacko conspiracy theories and false information (5 min read)
- Nieman Lab | What works (and doesn’t) for advertising your news organization’s subscriptions (3 min read)
- The New York Times | Google Knows Where You’ve Been, but Does It Know Who You Are? (8 min read)
- https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/12/magazine/google-maps-location-data-privacy.html
- Media Voices Podcast | Columbia Journalism Review’s Mathew Ingram on what publishers get wrong about trust (33 min listen)
- Digiday | ‘There’s just so little trust’: Marketers have growing suspicions of kickbacks in ad tech (6 min read)
- Nieman Lab | Americans expect to get their news from social media, but they don’t expect it to be accurate (2 min read)
- The New Yorker | Can Mark Zuckerberg Fix Facebook Before It Breaks Democracy? (70 min read)
DCN’s must reads: week of August 9, 2018
Here are some of the best media stories our team has read so far this week:
- CNET | Apple, Facebook, YouTube, Spotify ban Infowars, touching off censorship debate (3 min read)
- Nieman Lab | What is a Scandinavian media company’s first-ever director of public policy up against? (13 min read)
- The New York Times | The Expensive Education of Mark Zuckerberg and Silicon Valley (7 min read)
- Bloomberg | A German Publisher Is Winning the Internet (7 min read)
- Columbia Journalism Review | Should journalists and researchers get a special exemption from Facebook’s rules? (3 min read)
- The Lenfest Institute | Hold on there, pardner: Texas Monthly is running a test to stop readers who use ad-blockers (11 min read)
- The Guardian | ‘Just use cat videos’: New York Times boss wants Facebook to cut out news (6 min read)
- Recode | The tech industry needs to reckon with the dark side of advertising, WordPress CEO Matt Mullenweg says (1h listen)
6 key takeaways from the Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2018
This year’s Reuters Institute Digital News Report contains some signs of hope for the news industry. According to the report, “Change is in the air with many media companies shifting models towards higher quality content and more emphasis on reader payment.” However, as the report points out, these emerging trends are fragile, unevenly distributed, and are emerging in the wake of many years of digital disruption, which has undermined both consumer and publisher confidence.
Based on a YouGov survey conducted with 74,000 people in 37 countries, this is the seventh in an annual series of reports that track the transition of the news industry towards an increasingly digital and multi-platform future. Among the many challenges highlighted in the report is a low level of trust in the media in most countries and concerns about fake news. The business side continues to struggle despite a rise in reader revenue, as it has failed to offset continued declines in print and digital advertising revenue.
Here are 6 key takeaways from Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2018:
- The use of social media for news has started to fall in a number of key markets after years of continuous growth. Usage is down 6% in the United States and is also down in the UK and France.
- Globally, the use of messaging apps for news is on the rise. WhatsApp is now used for news by around half of the sampled users in Malaysia (54%) and Brazil (48%) and by around third in Spain (36%) and Turkey (30%).
Across all countries, the average level of trust in the news in general remains relatively stable at 44%, with just over half (51%) agreeing that they trust the news media they themselves use most of the time.- By contrast, 34% of respondents say they trust news they find via search and fewer than a quarter (23%) say they trust the news they find in social media.
- Last year’s significant increase in subscription in the United States (the “Trump Bump”) has been maintained. The average number of people paying for online news has edged up in many countries, with significant increases coming from Norway (+4 percentage points), Sweden (+6), and Finland (+4).
- Privacy concerns have reignited the growth in ad-blocking software. More than a quarter of consumers now block on any device (27%). More than four in ten (42%) now use blockers in Greece (+6) with significant increases in Germany (+5) and the United States (+4).
The report concludes that the many changes this year serve as a reminder that things that once seemed certain (such as the importance of Facebook and the online advertising model) can quickly shift. The entire space continues to rapidly evolve, with technologies like voice-activated interfaces and artificial intelligence are on the rise, which will bring new opportunities as well as challenges. While the future of news remains uncertain, the report does provide hope that quality content will be increasingly rewarded in the future.
Online pay-TV customers will more than double in a year
New research from Parks Associates shows that 6% of U.S. broadband households are highly likely to subscribe to an online pay-TV service within the next 12 months, which would more than double the number subscribing today.
While traditional television subscriptions held quite steady from 2010 to 2015, they have declined year-over-year since 2015. Significantly, the percentage of households “cutting the cord” has increased between 2015 and 2017. Parks Associates also reports a larger number of “cord-never” households, though a much greater percentage of consumers are either testing new options or still in decision mode.
Why Consumers Cut the Cord
Price, cost, and low price/value perceptions dominate as reasons for pay-TV cancellation and cord shaving. More than 50% of households that have switched, shaved, or cut the cord in the 12 months prior to Parks Associates’ survey said that the reason is that their pay-TV service was not worth the cost. Parks Associates also found that about a third of cord cutters would have stayed with their service provider if offered a Netflix-style service bundled with broadcast TV channels.
Providers must replace revenues lost in the wake of fewer subscribers. However, only one-quarter to one-third of consumers are willing to pay more for their pay-TV services, even given the addition of highly appealing features.
Maintaining Customers & Sustaining Revenue
Thus, providers must prioritize consumer retention. Given that Parks Associates found that many pay-TV subscribers are unaware of the video on-demand (VoD) features available to them, pay-TV providers must do a better job in communicating VoD offerings, or they will lose consumer VoD viewing to online options. Providers should also consider adding the features that Parks Associates found are most appealing to digital video consumers (pause, restart, and rewind) for no extra cost in order to incentivize maintaining their pay-TV subscription.
The good news, according to Brett Sappington, Parks Associates’ Senior Director of Research, is that streaming is well-established, and consumers are familiar with its function, even without a deep understanding of the technology. And, while percentage of potential shavers and cancellers has risen, Sappington points out that many consumers are comfortable with what they have and not in a rush to change. This lapse provides providers and entrepreneurs openings for creative solutions to bring consumers ever closer to their ideal vision of price/value and feature excellence.

