The DCN Quarterly Revenue Report (QRR) delivers a quarterly pulse of the premium digital marketplace. The report includes a quarterly trend analysis of display and video revenue and sales metrics across desktop, mobile and tablet. No other competitive reports like these exist in the marketplace. If you are interested in learning more about this report and other DCN benchmark reports, please contact Rande@digitalcontentnext.org.
Articles by: "DCN"
DCN’s must reads: week of June 15, 2017
Here are some of the best media stories our team has read so far this week:
- Crunchbase | Advertising Giants Leave Little Room For AdTech Startups And VCs Are Noticing (5 min read)
- Monday Note | The Coming War: Browsers Against Advertising Pollution (5 min read)
- Digiday | USA Today Network’s Kevin Gentzel: Advertisers have duopoly ‘fatigue’(5 min read)
- Poynter | Is Facebook serious about helping publishers find subscribers? Industry leaders are watching carefully (4 min read)
- Bloomberg | This Tech Bubble Is Different (15 min read)
- WWD | Vox’s Ezra Klein Explains it All (9 min read)
- The Guardian | Google and Facebook face penalties if they don’t stop online hate (9 min read)
- The Wall Street Journal | Facebook Building Feature to Let Users Subscribe to News Publications (4 min read)
- Poynter | What’s behind the recent media bloodbath? The dominance of Google and Facebook (4 min read)
DCN’s must reads: week of June 08, 2017
Here are some of the best media stories our team has read so far this week:
- The Boston Globe | A Republican may be Internet privacy’s new champion (4 min read)
- Motherboard | The Creator of JavaScript Just Launched a Cryptocurrency to Improve Online Ads (4 min read)
- Precurs R. Blog | Alphabet-Google Big Takeaways from Trump Antitrust Chief’s Senate Answers (11 min read)
- The Intercept | Be Careful Celebrating Google’s New Ad Blocker (4 min read)
- Vice | Ad block argument (4 min read)
- MediaPost | Fighting Duopoly, Publishers See Added Value In Programmatic Marketplaces (2 min read)
- The Verge | Apple’s new anti-tracking system will make Google and Facebook even more powerful (5 min read)
- Buzzfeed | An Ad Network That Helps Fake News Sites Earn Money Is Now Asking Users To Report Fake News (11 min read)
- Marketing Land | 4 reasons why digital context matters (6 min read)
- The Washington Post | Amazon, Kickstarter, Reddit and Mozilla are staging a net neutrality online protest (3 min read)
- Bloomberg | WSJ Ends Google Users’ Free Ride, Then Fades in Search Results (4 min read)
DCN’s must reads: week of May 25, 2017
Here are some of the best media stories our team has read so far this week:
- The Washington Post | Facebook could tell us how Russia interfered in our elections. Why won’t it? (4 min read)
- Ad Age | How Advertisers Could Be Hurt if Net Neutrality Dies (4 min read)
- The Guardian | The great digital-age swindle… and the man fighting back (10 min read)
- The Information | What’s Next in the Business of News (5 min read)
- Ad Age | Opinion: Europe’s Strict New Privacy Rules Are Scary but Right (6 min read)
- Wired | Get Ready for the Next Big Privacy Backlash Against Facebook (3 min read)
- The Washington Post | Executive Editor Martin Baron delivers Oweida Lecture in Journalism Ethics at Penn State University (24 min read)
- Buzzfeed | Facebook Exec Says Technical Updates Are More Effective Than Fact Checkers To Fight Fake News (7 min read)
- The Conversation | We should levy Facebook and Google to fund journalism – here’s how (7 min read)
- MediaPost | ANA Gives Advertisers Guidance To Combat Lack Of Transparency In Programmatic (3 min read)
- MIT Technology Review | We Need More Alternatives to Facebook (12 min read)
DCN’s must reads: week of May 18, 2017
Here are some of the best media stories our team has read so far this week:
- The New York Times | How Google Took Over the Classroom (25 min read)
- The New York Times | A Network Ad Wrangler Undaunted by Facebook and Google (9 min read)
- The Guardian | Facebook promised to tackle fake news. But the evidence shows it’s not working (8 min read)
- AdAge | Team of Rivals: Inside Fox, Turner and Viacom’s Strange Collaboration (12 min read)
- MarketingLand | Facebook admits its 10th measurement mistake since September (3 min read)
- Columbia Journalism Review | Facebook paid pubs to use Live. Here’s what happened at the Times. (8 min read)
- The New York Times | How Privacy Became a Commodity for the Rich and Powerful (9 min read)
- Mashable | If you’re not sure why the alt-right is suddenly everywhere, this report is for you (2 min read)
- The Atlantic | The Thinning Line Between Commercial and Government Surveillance (4 min read)
- The Wall Street Journal | As Streaming Services Amp Up, Not all TV Channels Make the Cut (6 min read)
- TechDirt | Cable Industry’s Own Survey Shows Majority Support Net Neutrality Rules (6 min read)
Bloomberg’s customer-centric design ethos
AIGA, the design industry’s oldest and largest professional membership association, recently honored Bloomberg with its 2017 Corporate Leadership Award. This award was established to recognize a perceptive and forward-thinking organization that has been instrumental in the advancement of design by applying the highest standards, as a matter of policy, as well as its role in exemplifying the highest design standards within its respective industry. In announcing this honor, AIGA cited Bloomberg’s history of design innovation and advancement of design on multiple fronts:
Bloomberg L.P. advances design on multiple fronts through its industry leading products and unique company culture. Starting with the groundbreaking design of the original flagship product, the Bloomberg Terminal, the design of media products such as Bloomberg Businessweek and Bloomberg.com, and its innovative work spaces and sophisticated branding programs, design is integral to how the company operates and provides value to customers.
In conjunction with this milestone recognizing Bloomberg’s commitment to great design across all aspects of the company, we discussed the importance of design ethos with three experts who are heavily involved in the design of Bloomberg’s core Financial Products:
Fahd Arshad, head of User Experience (UX) design for financial products, Ali Jeffery, Visual Design Lead for the Bloomberg Professional service, and Mike Mallon, Engineering Manager in Bloomberg’s application toolkits group.
ALI JEFFERY: Bloomberg’s design philosophy is to lead, not to follow. We definitely have a very strong opinion and express it in all of the facets of design across Bloomberg.
FAHD ARSHAD: Our design ethos is to make sure we are being useful to our customers. Every time we sit down and design something, we start with questions like, “How is this going to help our customers do their jobs?” “Is it going to make them more efficient?” Then, everything else comes from that. It’s a classic case of function over form. And that starts all of our design conversations.
When we express a piece of information, it is going to be in your face. We utilize high contrast colors to enable our customers to pick out information from a lot of noise. I would probably argue that this is the hallmark of our design, especially when it comes to the visual aspect of it.
MIKE MALLON: We’re aiming for efficiency, trying to make everything fast for the users, but also make it fast and easy to learn new things. Both of those pieces are important. We need to support both our power users and people who are just getting started and aren’t familiar with things yet.
Does Bloomberg have a design hallmark or style?
ALI: Definitely, especially with our software. Our black and amber color scheme is our strongest hallmark. You can see it across the trading floor. You know which application is Bloomberg from very far away.
Amber is our base font color. A lot of systems you see today will use much more neutral tones. But the amber and black has really become who we are. And it’s something we protect as part of our brand.
Our keyboard’s yellow keys are also a part of our design presence and our recognizability across a trading floor. They became a unique feature for Bloomberg and something that we chose to highlight and see as part of our identity.
FAHD: The color scheme just became iconic. You’d walk onto the floor and you’d see a row of amber and black screens and you knew you were in a Bloomberg shop. It’s interesting how we’ve seen that evolve and some of our competitors have started picking it up. It became sort of the hallmark of being a financial superpower that you had a dark background. But we stayed with it, because that is our hallmark. That is our brand. And our customers love it.
How does design apply to your area of focus?
ALI: I think one of the things I’m the most proud of working on is the framework of our system. We are creating the building blocks for the rest of the company to design their software. We’re working on making the underlying toolkit that the applications rely on more user-friendly.
MIKE: My role is to implement the designs that the UX team comes up within our applications. A big piece of that is figuring out how we can be reactive to new designs. One of the most interesting things we do is bring users into our User Experience Lab and try new things out with them and then react to their feedback. Then, the thing that we actually release will be something that is really useful to actual clients who have tested it out.
FAHD: That extreme focus on customer needs is what drives our design language or design process. For that matter, we start each conversation with our business managers, for example, who are often subject matter experts. So each conversation about a design problem starts with, “What is it that we’re trying to solve?”
How is Bloomberg design different from how some other companies might view or articulate design?
FAHD: At Bloomberg, we don’t spend a lot of time looking at what other people do. We know what our goal is. We have customers that we need to satisfy. The one big difference I hear from other people is how much we cultivate our relationship with our clients and how willing our clients are to come in and help us improve our products. It’s non-trivial for a portfolio manager or trader who has different time commitments to give us an hour-and-a-half or two hours of their day and to come to our office and sit in the lab. We’re lucky that, as an organization, we have cultivated that amount of loyalty among our customers and that sense of shared mission.
MIKE: With our focus on efficiency, it’s not just what looks pretty on the screen, which is what a lot of companies use to define good design. That is, they open it up and ask “Is it aesthetically pleasing?” or “Is it pretty?”
Our whole philosophy is about showing all the functionality to the user – that is, making it very accessible, very easy for them to use. This may sometimes lead to screens that look complicated at first glance, and someone might say, “Wow, there’s a lot here.” But what we’re actually doing is putting all of that at the user’s fingertips right away.
How do Bloomberg’s customers influence design?
MIKE: Well, they’re part of the process. We try new things on a bunch of employees first, but then we always bring customers in to try it out before we actually build something and turn it into a product. This way, we actually know that what we’re building is valuable to them.
FAHD: We take whatever our hypothesis is, we talk to the subject matter experts and we express our findings as early designs. But we try and validate them with our customers, because our end goal is being purposeful in our designs and providing value to our customers.
A big part of the design process is all working towards a single understanding – talking to our customers, understanding their needs and then designing to them. Since our sales force is constantly in touch with them, we get a lot of feedback. This has caused us to really evolve our product. We have an underlying technology infrastructure that allows us to push new software out to our clients very quickly, so we’re able to react to any of their needs. It’s actually really beneficial for our clients.
Bloomberg was founded on bringing transparency to financial markets, how is that principle reflected in Bloomberg’s design?
ALI: We really never design for design’s sake. It’s always meant to address our customer’s needs. We’re trying to create a clear hierarchy. We’re trying to make sure that they can find and parse information as quickly as possible.
MIKE: I think transparency is very important in how we do design. One way we show transparency is by showing clients ahead of time what it is we’re going to build.
Another way that we’re very transparent is we try to release our designs across the whole Terminal. So, all customers get access to the same designs. They all get access to the same types of things. And we’re very transparent in that we’re releasing these different features to all our clients at the same time. Everyone gets the same benefit. And we keep them in the loop on what we’re doing and why we’re doing it.
FAHD: Today, there is such a wealth of data that people are drowning in it. The important part is not having access to data, necessarily, but paying attention to the right amount of data or the right kind of data. And that’s what I personally see as the definition of transparency today: surfacing what you need to know, when you need to know it, and why this is relevant to you.
The goal of our design process has to be to make our customers more efficient and more productive. If we keep doing that, we will continue to bring value to them and be useful to them. And that’s where we will continue to be successful.
Note: This interview is reprinted with permission from the Tech at Bloomberg blog.
DCN’s must reads: week of May 11, 2017
Here are some of the best media stories our team has read so far this week:
- The Economist | Eroding exceptionalism: Internet firms’ legal immunity is under threat (9 min read)
- MIT Technology Review | Digital Advertising Takes a Hit (4 min read)
- New York Post | Google and Facebook could lose $2.9B in ad sales: report (2 min read)
- The Wall Street Journal | The Rise of Transparent Digital Ad Buying (5 min read)
- The New York Times | Ad Buyers Have a Say in Whether Real News Survives (8 min read)
- The Drum | TV is not dying – it’s lies, damn lies and bad media statistics (11 min read)
- Medium | This is How Google will Collapse (6 min read)
- USA Today | USA TODAY asks FBI to probe rise in fake Facebook followers (7 min read)
- The Washington Post | Leave it to the geniuses at Harvard to come up with a solution to fake news (3 min read)
- The Economist | The world’s most valuable resource is no longer oil, but data (5 min read)
- Stratechery | The Local News Business Model (11 min read)
- Deadline | Liberty Media CEO: Amazon’s Capabilities Are “Ridiculously Scary” (2 min read)
- HBO | Net Neutrality II: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (20 min view)
DCN’s must reads: week of May 4, 2017
Here are some of the best media stories our team has read so far this week:
- The New York Times Magazine | Can Facebook Fix Its Own Worst Bug? (27 min read)
- The Verge | Everything Verizon says in this terrible video about net neutrality vs. the truth (5 min read)
- PageFair | Supporting new European data regulation (4 min read)
- TechCrunch | Google will now allow 300×250 ads above the fold on mobile webpages, says they can be ‘user-friendly’ (3 min read)
- Fortune | Google and Facebook Account For Nearly All Growth in Digital Ads (3 min read)
- Mumbrella Asia | Ad tech has ‘morphed into a monster’ with billions of ad dollars being handed to ‘middlemen’ (4 min read)
- Ars Technica | Report: Facebook helped advertisers target teens who feel “worthless” (3 min read)
- The Wall Street Journal | Twitter Teams Up With Bloomberg for Streaming News (3 min read)
- The Financial Times | Publishers warm to Google plan for Chrome ad-blocker (3 min read)
- The Guardian | Facebook admits: governments exploited us to spread propaganda (3 min read)
DCN’s must reads: week of April 27, 2017
Here are some of the best media stories our team has read so far this week:
- Financial Times | Modern monopolists are redefining competition (3 min read)
- The New York Times | Is It Time to Break Up Google? (7 min read)
- The Globe and Mail | In conversation with Irwin Gotlieb, an ad buyer in a Google world (7 min read)
- WSJ| Publishers Weigh Pros and Cons of Potential Google Ad-Blocking Feature (4 min read)
- Digiday | The Guardian pulls out of Facebook’s Instant Articles and Apple News (3 min read)
- Business Insider | The evidence is piling up — Silicon Valley is being destroyed (5 min read)
- The Drum | Are we entering adtech’s era of accountability (7 min read)
- Advertising Week | With Brand Safety in Focus, Digital Advertisers Are Quickly Shifting Toward Direct Programmatic (3 min read)
- The Washington Post | The FCC just released a plan to undo its own net neutrality rules (5 min read)
- The New York Times Magazine | Can Facebook Fix Its Own Worst Bug? (29 min read)
- Fortune | Hulu and the Fight for Real-Time TV (20 min read)
Pre-roll is the most informative and engaging video ad format
As brands continue to identify the most impactful video advertising formats, the report shared detailed insights about which format elicits the strongest consumer reaction. IPG Media Lab and YuMe recently released the results of a study that looks at user experience across video ad formats and devices, performance against brand KPIs and optimizing performance across video ad formats. Their report, Ad Format (R)evolution finds that pre-roll remains a solid, formidable platform in which to showcase brand offerings. Compared to mid-roll and outstream, pre-roll is considered the least interruptive across devices, with only 17% of mobile device users feeling the ad interrupts the content, compared with 60% on outstream and 72% on mid-roll.
Other key findings include:
- The least intrusive formats are also the most memorable.
- Mid-roll ranked higher in message recall for desktop viewers at 27%, compared to 8% for outstream.
- Pre-roll feels more engaging.
- Unskippable pre-roll is the clear winner on mobile.
- Social video is well integrated and less disruptive to the browsing experience than other formats.
- Mid-roll works better on larger screens.
- More than half of those surveyed want to close both outstream and pre-roll ads immediately.
This research confirms that consumers are most critical of ads on mobile, which is their most personal device. And among the conclusions, the report emphasizes how important it is for advertising to minimize its intrusiveness and maximize engagement in order to generate higher purchase intent for all ad formats and delivery channels.
DCN’s must reads: week of April 20, 2017
Here are some of the best media stories our team has read so far this week:
- Ad Week | How Brands and Agencies Are Fighting Back Against Facebook and Google’s Measurement Snafus (17 min read)
- The Washington Post | Google and Facebook oppose managing the Internet. Except when they’re doing it. (4 min read)
- The Verge | The FCC’s plan to kill net neutrality will also kill internet privacy (5 min read)
- Motherboard | Princeton’s Ad-Blocking Superweapon May Put an End to the Ad-Blocking Arms Race (5 min read)
- Advertising Age | Advertisers, Agencies and Publishers Need to Fight a Common Enemy — Bad Guys — Not Each Other (3 min read)
- Ad Exchanger | The Market For Ad-Tech Startups Is As Inhospitable As Ever (4 min read)
- The New York Times | How YouTube’s Shifting Algorithms Hurt Independent Media (7 min read)
- Buzzfeed | This Survey Shows Americans Can’t Agree On What Exactly “News” Is On Facebook (5 min read)
- The New York Times | A Lesson in Moscow About Trump-Style ‘Alternative Truth’ (9 min read)
- Advertising Age | World Wide Whitelist: Will Brand Safety Strip the Web of Its Color? (4 min read)
- The Verge | Instant Recall (15 min read)
- The Washington Post | Facebook still denies what it is. The Cleveland murder shows how. (4 min read)








