Research / Insights on current and emerging industry topics
Media’s shifting profits raise questions about future growth
New BCG research examines how profits are shifting across media businesses, highlighting the growing importance of distribution platforms and the implications for publishers’ investment and audience strategies.
October 19, 2026 | By Rande Price, Research VP – DCNConnect on
Media companies face a difficult growth equation. Expanding content and audience reach does not necessarily translate into stronger financial returns, particularly when consumers have little additional attention to give and profits are unevenly distributed. For publishers deciding where to invest, understanding who captures the value of media consumption is increasingly important. New research from Boston Consulting Group (BCG) examines the relationship between industry revenue, consumer attention, and profitability, offering a clearer picture of the pressures shaping publishers’ growth strategies.
BCG’s Media’s New Fight for Eyeballs, Profits, and Control puts U.S. media revenue at $631 billion in 2025. Average annual growth reaches 5.4% since 2018, but adjustments for inflation and population growth reduce that rate to 0.8%. The difference reveals how little underlying growth the industry has generated, even as competition for audience attention and advertising dollars intensifies. More striking, however, is how the research exposes the widening gap between where media revenue is generated and where profits accumulate.
Attention has limits
BCG places active media consumption at 25.3 hours weekly in 2025, compared with 26.2 hours in 2018. Social media and gaming gain share within that relatively fixed pool. Among eligible respondents in BCG’s consumer survey, 61% say increased time with one media activity displaces another. A newsletter, podcast, or video offering therefore competes for time that audiences already spend elsewhere.
Total consumption can still increase through background use and multitasking. This helps explain how media occupies more of the day without receiving more focused attention. A longer session can reflect sustained interest, habitual use, or content playing alongside another activity.
Different uses of media can support different revenue opportunities, but session length alone does not reveal how closely audiences engage. For publishers expanding across formats, the more useful question is whether additional consumption contributes to advertising revenue, subscription conversion, retention, or other business goals.
Revenue leadership does not guarantee profit leadership
Video generates the most revenue, while social media accounts for the largest share of estimated profits across the three categories BCG examines. In 2025, video accounts for 59% of their combined revenue, social media for 28%, and audio for 13%. Video’s share of combined estimated profits stands at 34%, compared with 77% in 2018. Social media’s profit share reaches 55%, compared with 10% in 2018. Audio accounts for 11% of profits, compared with 13% in 2018, while its revenue share remains steady.
BCG also examines how profits shift among content owners, aggregators, and distributors within these categories. It finds that large distribution platforms capture the biggest profit gains. This group includes YouTube, social platforms such as Instagram, and services such as Netflix and Spotify. These businesses combine scale with influence over what audiences discover and choose.
Publishers and platforms both seek audience engagement and advertising revenue. YouTube’s advantage combines a vast content supply with recommendation systems that draw on viewing behavior across sources. An individual publisher contributes content, while YouTube can keep audiences watching by moving among many publishers and creators. That scale helps explain why audience growth can produce different financial returns across the value chain.
For publishers, platform exposure and a direct audience relationship offer different commercial benefits. Platforms can expand a publisher’s reach while retaining control over the algorithms that recommend its content. That exposure does not necessarily give publishers access to audience data or a direct way to bring those audiences back. A partnership’s financial contribution therefore depends on compensation, opportunities for direct engagement, and terms governing content use.
AI adds another route to discovery
BCG reports that 23% of consumers use general-purpose AI for entertainment recommendations. It considers two possibilities: consumers begin discovery with an external assistant, or media services integrate AI and remain the starting point. These scenarios extend its examination of where consumer choices occur, rather than establish a settled outcome.
For publishers, the challenge includes earning value from content when audiences encounter it through platforms or AI tools. Direct audience relationships, licensing, and distribution partnerships offer different ways to generate returns. Their contribution depends on the revenue they deliver, the audience relationships they strengthen, and the influence publishers retain over content use.




